A.C.L.U. COURT TRANSCRIPTS

Note, I have changed the posting dates, so that the post will follow from first posting to newest, except this post.
At the end of this post, is part of the recent appeal transcript, names have been removed along with some protective content, This Judge who heard the original case, and also heard the appeal, which I will post the entire transcript, has covered up this child being illegally taken out of Russia, and has tried to stop me from reporting this matter to any goverment official or the biological father and the news media.
I can not as a person accept such an order as if it was a military order that goes against the law and the constitution, when i post the complete transcripts you will see how a judge covers up for a child abduction, and know that this case should never have been given such an order. I now am sending out copys of my records and documents including this case to many groups in the U.S. that seek abducted children from biological parent, show them how a judge can attempt to cover such a crime and criminal, I wonder how many other people tried to report the same type of crime only to have this judge block their reporting. How many other parent out their have not been told the were abouts of their child because of questionable judges who attempt to violate the consititutional rights of American citizens, cover up crimes and disgrace the trust placed in them? I have no doubt where this is going, once the appeal is completed, I will not be in violation of such a disgraceful court order, thus any action that is taken, by this court, will not be upheld.
For those who wanted to see the transcrips of the court hearings, I will be posting a link next week to another blog with all the transcripts. On Friday I meet with the A.C.L.U. in Chicago. The A.C.L.U. is very disturbed about this ruling and the wording of the Dupage County Judge. One of the points my attorney stated under the appeal to the same judge that issued the orginal order is this. Several verbal orders were given and not placed in the written order, this was done intentionaly. Example Judge ordered no contact with the biological father even if he contacted me, the father of the child taken out of Russia illegally, without the biological fathers permission or knowldge. When the attorney asked the judge which order is valid the verbal (transcript) order or the written order, the judge stated all his orders are valid.
In Illinois when a public official covers for a crime knowingly, then they lose their immunity, this judge who has attempted to cover up this child kidnapping, and bar an American from his civil rights, hopefully will be disbared. I said several times, these scammers are networked, tie into shady attorneys, and use the legal system for self gain. I will know this Friday, if I can legally name the Dupage County Judge on my blogs.
I am waiting for a letter from the biological father which will give me rights to post a picture and name of his child taken out of Russia Illegally on the blogs. I have not sent the transcripts and related documents to the Russian Embassy as of today. That request should be completed this weekend.
Again I want to say thank you to the people who care, this is about victims of scams, and rights that each and every American has. Now we appeal by April 11 2008, the disgraceful ruling of the Dupage County Judge.
Partial Transcript
Attorney: My client's primary concern is that he was prohibited from contacting certain individuals, certain individuals that are not party to this case, not litigants in this case, did not appear before any hearing before this court....
Petitioner's ex husband (biological father of child taken out of Russia illegally without his authority or knowledge) Petitioner's mother, there is prohibitions on contacting them, even though those people never testified. They never came before the court ans said that they don't want contact with him.
As far as the court knows, these people may want to--they may be friends with him. They may be best friends with him. We don't live in Russia. We do live in the United States. And our constitution does guarantee him freedom of speech. He has a right, if he wants, to contact these people.
The Court: You Wrong, anythime somebody indirectly or directly harasses another, I am entitled to prohibit that conduct ( This judge now allows people being reported for crimes to go to him and say it is harassment)
Attorney: But I think the court is making a big assumption, and that assumption was not introduced into evidence. That assumption is that these individuals, these thrid parties, don't want to have contact with Mr. Green
The Court: That's not the assumption at all. The assumption is that the contact with those individuals constitutes harasment of the petitioner, Thats the assumption I make.
......
Attorney: Other than these individuals never appeared before the court, they never testified. This Court has no clue weather the ex-husband in Russia wants to be friends with Mr. Green. But now..
The Court: That's all True.
Attorney: But now we've entered an order that prohibits him from associating with this person in Russia.
The Court: Yes we have.
Attorney: Likewise, his mother in law, we've done the same thing without this Court having heard anything from these people. He has a constitutional right to associate, to speech. And now we have completely trampled on that right and said he cannot do it.
He couldn't even call the father in Russia to---if he wanted to say he would have a cup of coffee or I'll be going to be---- I'm going to go to Greece? Do you want to meet me? He could not even do that under this order.
And now lets take it a step further. Let's assume that he did want to call ansd say, listen, I do have information about your son. Thats still not---that's still protected speech.. He has a right to that.....
The other thing that was--that was--thats not in the order (written), but what the court has said was he could not contact, in essence, government agencies to report crimes. The court ruled that a petition would have to be filed before he was able to do that. (with the same judge)
.....
Attorney: My reading of the totality of the transcript is the Russian consulate and those indivuals
...
And my reading of the transcript is, if he wants to do that he has to file another petition before the court..
....
Attorney: I think he does have a right of association or right of free speech with those people, There is no testimony that they do not want anything to do with him, and now we prohibited that conduct. We have prohibited those people from contacting Him.
I don't think it is the intent of the statute. And I think the court has already said if he wants to contact them only for harass her, there's no even testimony thats he's saying call your daughter, call your ex wife or anything like that. He is just saying I want to have contact with these people if I so choose and if they choose. They may say I don't want anything to do with him, leave me alone. But I think he has a constitutional right to do that, judge, so were are asking the court to modify the order..
Now, the other thing was about the blog. It says he can not have a blog or use the internet. I think again, constitutionally, he has the right to have free speech and put on the internet information.
....
I think if he wants to set forth his life story he has a constitutional right to do that.
The Court: What the order says is, if I can read it. shall---something and remove his myspace-dot-com blog and all contact-content from russian-mail order bride victims dot com, refering to or related to the petitioner, her son and family or emplyer and any reference thereto anywhere else on the internet.
Attorney: I think he can still say that I'm married. I had a wife..
The Court: Okay. Well we disagree then.
Attorney: I think constitutionally...
The Court: I mean, I don't know........
....
As the transcripts get posted in whole, this is how Judges cover up for criminials, cover up children being taken out of Russia Illegally, Being abducted. Not allowing reporting of these crimes. I truely don't care what this judge will do to me, for telling my story, reporting and communicating with the Russian and American agency's, reporting this story to the news media and other groups of children abducted, Holding on to my constitutionally rights and fighting for all victims of these scams. There is nothing that this judge can do that can make up for the biologicals fathers loss of his son the past five years, the remorse i have for falling into this scam, and the disgrace of the many Americans who have died for rights that this judge throws out to cover up this crime. I have faith in the legal system, even with questionable judges. I will tell you, as you read the whole transcripts there was never no harassment, in fact my Wife lied several times in court and shown it to the court, does it matter with a questionable judge? When the U.S. consulate document was given to the Judge at the end of the hearing, in which the biological fathers statement was on it, the Judge said " I don't care about the father"
Christopher Green